Fatigue is a critical safety hazard. Discover strategies and technologies that help protect workers and support safer, more sustainable operations.
.png)

Why fatigue isn’t just “tired staff” — and how smart systems can help prevent it
Fatigue is more than simply feeling tired. In high-risk environments such as mining, transport, heavy equipment operation, or remote maintenance worksites, fatigue can seriously impair judgement, reaction time, and decision-making — significantly increasing the chance of accidents, near misses, and safety incidents.
In 2026 and beyond, effective fatigue management demands more than good intentions. It requires a holistic approach: combining smart technology, robust policies, and a safety culture that treats fatigue as a key hazard.
The Fatigue Risk Landscape
What is fatigue — and why does it matter?
Fatigue refers to a state of physical and/or mental exhaustion resulting from prolonged work, disrupted sleep-wake cycles, shift work, or environmental stressors (noise, vibration, heat, monotony, etc.).
In industries like mining and transport:
Yet fatigue tends to be under-recognised — often under-reported and under-controlled. Some studies highlight that fatigue-related incidents are likely under-represented in safety statistics.
Fundamentals of Fatigue Risk Management
According to regulatory guidance (e.g. from Safe Work Australia), managing fatigue involves a systematic risk-management process: identify contributing factors; assess risks; implement controls; and monitor and review outcomes.
Key control measures include:
Emerging Tech & Data-Driven Approaches
Today’s technology offers new tools to help monitor fatigue and alertness — moving beyond mere schedule design and self-reporting.
Wearables & AI-based monitoring
Recent advances in fatigue detection leverage wearable sensors or behavioural monitoring (e.g. in-vehicle systems) to detect early signs of fatigue or reduced alertness.
These systems can continuously analyse physiological or behavioural data (sleep patterns, blink rate, alertness, heart-rate variability) to flag when a worker may be fatigued — enabling intervention before a critical task.
Predictive rostering & scheduling tools
Rather than relying on fixed shift patterns, many organisations now use fatigue-aware scheduling tools that model sleep, rest, and workload to minimise fatigue risk — optimising work/rest cycles based on science and human factors data.
Integrated safety platforms for real-time oversight
By combining incident data, shift records, worker reports, environmental conditions, and fatigue-monitoring outputs in a unified safety system (like myosh), organisations gain holistic visibility over fatigue risk across their entire workforce — internal staff and contractors.
This kind of integrated system enables trend analysis, early warning signals, fatigue-related risk dashboards, and automated alerts — helping companies move from reactive fatigue response to proactive fatigue prevention.
Building a Culture that Treats Fatigue Seriously
Technology and policy are critical — but culture is the foundation. Without buy-in, fatigue controls can fail. Key cultural enablers include:
In mining-sector research, fatigue has been strongly linked to mental health outcomes — highlighting that addressing fatigue is not just about preventing accidents, but supporting overall worker wellbeing.
Integrating Fatigue Management into Your Overall Safety & HSEQ Platform
Using a safety platform like myosh, organisations can embed fatigue management into their broader HSEQ framework seamlessly. Key capabilities include:
Organisations also integrate myosh with external fatigue management software — enabling seamless data sharing between fatigue detection systems, rosters, and safety analytics dashboards for a complete, real-time view of workforce wellbeing.
This integration supports a realistic, data-driven, and enforceable fatigue risk management program — rather than relying on ad-hoc, manual, or “tick-box” approaches.
Starting a Fatigue Risk Management Program: Practical Next Steps
In high-risk industries like mining, transport, remote operations or heavy-machinery environments — fatigue isn’t a “soft” wellbeing issue. It’s a core safety hazard.
By combining policy, training, culture, and modern technology, organisations can move beyond reactive fatigue-response to a systematic, proactive fatigue-risk management framework.
When fatigue is treated with the same discipline as other safety risks, and managed as part of a unified safety system, organisations not only protect workers — they build resilience, reliability, and long-term safety performance.
Fatigue can’t always be eliminated — but with the right approach, its impact on your people and operations can be managed, mitigated, and measured.