A practical 2026 guide to managing psychosocial hazards through job design—clear priorities, realistic timelines, stronger support and better change management.
.png)

Psychosocial risk management works best when it’s built into everyday work practices. Enhancing job design—such as workload planning, role clarity, and change support—can reduce psychosocial hazards and strengthen overall performance. Here are practical controls to apply straight away, plus a 30-day rollout plan.
The positive reframe for 2026
Psychosocial hazards are work factors that can cause psychological harm (and physical harm too). Under WHS laws, organisations must manage these risks like any other safety risk—identify hazards, assess risk, implement controls, and review effectiveness.
The good news: the most effective psychosocial improvements often make work easier to do well—less rework, clearer priorities, better decisions, and fewer “always urgent” weeks.
Key takeaways
Why “training and posters” don’t move the needle
Training and posters play an important role in building understanding and keeping wellbeing visible. The biggest gains, however, often come from strengthening the way work is designed—clear priorities, manageable workloads, and reliable support—because these changes prevent pressure from building in the first place. A strong psychosocial approach combines awareness with practical job-design controls..
10 job design controls that reduce psychosocial risk
1) Make workload visible (and managed)
Move from “everyone’s flat out” to explicit capacity + priorities.
Practical controls:
2) Fix timelines at the system level (not hero level)
Unachievable deadlines create chronic strain and shortcuts.
Practical controls:
3) Tighten role clarity and decision rights
Lack of role clarity is a known psychosocial hazard.
Practical controls:
4) Increase job control where you can
Low job control is another common hazard.
Practical controls:
5) Build support into the workflow (not just “available on request”)
Poor support is a psychosocial hazard.
Practical controls:
6) Design change management like a safety risk
Poor organisational change management is explicitly called out as a psychosocial hazard.
Practical controls:
7) Create “fairness cues” people can see
Perceived unfairness (organisational justice) fuels stress, conflict, and attrition.
Practical controls:
8) Protect recovery time (fatigue is not just a physical hazard)
Fatigue appears across multiple WHS psychosocial frameworks and codes.
Practical controls:
9) Reduce exposure to aggression, trauma, and harmful behaviours
WA’s code explicitly includes violence/aggression and inappropriate behaviours.
Practical controls:
10) Improve the physical environment and tools
A poor physical environment can contribute to psychosocial risk (noise, heat, cramped spaces, unreliable tech).
Practical controls:
A simple 30-day plan to kick this off
Week 1: Listen + map the work
Week 2: Pick 2–3 hazards to design out
Week 3: Pilot in one team
Week 4: Lock it in
Where myosh fits: Psychosocial Risk (with Skodel)
If you want psychosocial risk management to sit inside your existing HSEQ approach—without launching “another separate platform”—myosh offers a Psychosocial Risk third-party module using Skodel’s risk assessment tools within myosh.
It’s designed to support consultation, assessment, control planning and review in a structured way, aligned to the risk management expectations in relevant codes and guidance.
Psychosocial risk isn’t addressed by awareness campaigns alone. One of the most effective ways to reduce harm—and lift performance—is to strengthen how work is designed and supported: clearer priorities, realistic timelines, and practical support where it’s needed most.