From fatigue and scheduling pressures to load safety and compliance reporting, transport and logistics organisations face complex health and safety challenges. The Chain of Responsibility framework makes it clear that safety responsibility extends across the entire transport chain. This article outlines the most critical safety priorities under CoR and provides practical guidance on achieving compliance in real-world operations.
.png)
.jpg)
The transport and logistics sector plays a vital role in moving goods and people across Australia, but it also sits among the highest-risk industries for workplace incidents — particularly road transport. Under Australian law, safety in this sector isn’t just about drivers following rules; it’s a shared legal and ethical responsibility that extends throughout the supply chain. This is the essence of the Chain of Responsibility (CoR).
What is the Chain of Responsibility (CoR)?
The Chain of Responsibility is a legislative framework embedded in the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL) that spreads legal accountability beyond the driver to every party that influences transport activities. This includes companies that consign, load, schedule, receive, or otherwise influence how heavy vehicle transport is planned and executed.
Under CoR, any person or organisation that has control or influence over a transport task is responsible for ensuring safety is maintained and breaches of the HVNL are prevented. These obligations are based on the functions performed, not job titles — meaning a consignor, scheduler, or even a director may be held liable if their decisions contribute to unsafe practices.
Why CoR Matters for Health & Safety
Traditionally, drivers were held solely responsible for breaches of road and safety laws — but this missed the upstream causes of unsafe situations. CoR recognises that decisions made well before a truck hits the road — in offices, warehouses, or boardrooms — can create conditions that make breaches almost inevitable.
For example:
By legally linking these decision points to safety outcomes, CoR creates a shared safety culture that aligns with broader workplace health and safety law.
Regulatory Impacts on the Transport & Logistics Industry
1. Expanded Duty Across the Supply Chain
Under CoR, every party involved in road transport — including employers, consignors, packers, loaders, schedulers, operators, and consignees — must take reasonable steps to ensure safety so far as is reasonably practicable. This mirrors obligations in general workplace health and safety law.
Executive officers also face an executive duty (due diligence) — requiring proactive oversight to ensure compliance at all levels of the organisation.
2. Risk-Based Compliance, Not Box-Ticking
A key shift under CoR is the move toward risk-based safety management: instead of merely complying with discrete rules, organisations must:
This approach mirrors the WHS risk management hierarchy and encourages continuous improvement, rather than reactive firefighting.
3. Heavy Emphasis on Documentation & Reporting
To demonstrate compliance under CoR, organisations must document what they did to manage safety risks. In a prosecution scenario, the business has to show it took all reasonable steps to prevent a breach, and that those steps were proportionate to the risk. Regular reporting to executives and structured audits are therefore essential.
Top Health & Safety Priorities Under CoR
To succeed under the Chain of Responsibility framework, transport and logistics organisations should prioritise:
1. Fatigue Management
Driver fatigue remains one of the most significant work health and safety hazards. Under the HVNL and CoR, businesses must ensure drivers do not exceed regulated hours without adequate rest. This requires proactive scheduling and workload planning — not just driver compliance.
2. Realistic Scheduling & Timeframes
Pressure from clients, sales teams, or internal KPIs that encourages unrealistic timeframes can directly push drivers toward speeding, fatigue breaches, or unsafe driving practices. CoR compliance means planning schedules that are reasonable and safe, not just cost-efficient.
3. Load Safety & Mass Compliance
Incorrectly loaded or overweight vehicles pose serious safety risks — from rollovers to cargo shifting. Organisations must implement checks at loading points and ensure that weight declarations and restraints are accurate. This responsibility extends to consignors and loaders alike.
4. Safety Culture & Worker Engagement
A strong safety culture supports open hazard reporting, shared responsibility for safety outcomes, and continuous learning. Senior leadership commitment is foundational — not only for compliance, but for truly reducing harm.
5. Integrating Safety Management Systems
A modern Safety Management System (SMS) can integrate CoR risk controls into everyday operations. This includes workflows for hazard identification, risk assessment, incident reporting, training records, and performance monitoring — all documented and easily auditable.
Real-World Compliance Strategies
Here are practical steps organisations can take to align with CoR expectations:
These strategies embed safety at every decision point, making compliance a proactive business advantage rather than a regulatory burden.
Chain of Responsibility reinforces a simple but powerful truth: safety cannot be delegated. Every link in the transport and logistics supply chain influences outcomes on the road. By embracing CoR principles — from realistic scheduling to robust risk management — organisations can protect workers, improve compliance, and enhance operational resilience.